The Stock Market and the 2020 Election
Posted September 23, 2020
Posted September 23, 2020
What will happen to the stock market if (fill in the blank) wins the election?
This is a question that I am getting more frequent as we near the 2020 Presidential election. I will not be getting into politics and discussing which candidate will be better for the country or the economy. During this post, I will discuss the history of Presidential elections and how they have affected the stock market both in the year of the election and subsequent years.
It’s hard to speak about Presidential elections without being political because the election is a political process. Still, the stock market is an amazing machine that does not necessarily care about elections’ outcomes. The data shows that despite which political party wins the election and holds office for the next 4 to 8 years, the market is extremely resilient at growing shareholder value.
Since 1928 the S&P 500 has averaged 11.3% growth during Presidential election years and 9.9% in the year after the election. We also see that volatility in the market has historically decreased during the 200 days surrounding the election.1Now, this does not mean that every election year the market goes up, but what it does show is that there is not a correlation between presidential candidates and the stock market. Since 1928, there have been only 4 presidential election years where the S&P 500 went down: 1932, 1940, 2000, 2008.
In 1932, Franklin D Roosevelt was elected President for the first time. During the middle of the Great Depression, the market experienced a -15.15% decline that year.2 1932 was in the middle of the Great Depression likely was a much bigger determining factor that year’s market performance than the election itself. It is important to note that in 1933 the S&P 500 increased 49.59%, the year after FDR was elected President.
In 1940, World War II was raging in Europe, and the United States was inching closer and closer to its involvement in the war. The S&P 500 declined in 1940 by -15.29% and another -17.86% in 1941.3 This could have been because FDR had just been elected to his 3rd term as President, but there were much bigger things happening throughout the world at that time.
In 2000, George W. Bush won the Presidency after a nail-biting election and Supreme Court decision (remember hanging chads?). The S&P 500 dropped -10.14% in 2000 and another -13.04% in 2001.4 This is surprising to a lot of people because Bush was regarded as a very business-friendly President. The common thinking is that Republicans pump up the market because of tax jobs and business-friendly policies. So, it’s counter-intuitive to think that the market would do poorly during these first two years. However, by the time George Bush took office, the dot.com bubble had been in full effect for more than 9 months. Entire internet companies vanished overnight, and many people’s portfolios were destroyed, chasing the new hot trend (we will have to talk about that in another article). It is hard to blame the election or the newly sitting President for the market fallout after the dot.com bubble.
In 2008, Barrack Obama took over in an abysmal market year. The S&P 500 was down -38.49% in 2008, but you cannot say that the cause of the poor market performance was due to the election.5 Everyone remembers that the economy had been in a full nosedive since early 2008 when the housing bubble burst, bank solvency came into serious question, and the world economy was on the verge of collapsing. The recovery since 2009 has been the longest bull market run in history and has returned multiples in value over the last decade for the investors.
It is easy to get caught up in the daily news cycle that monetizes fear and sensationalism. News is a business, and every tv channel, newspaper, and website fights for your eyeballs so that they can generate advertising dollars. You should read the newspaper or watch the news to be an informed citizen, but you should not use them for advice on investment decisions.
In conclusion, there is no supporting evidence that election years are different from any other year regarding expected market returns. A US President’s political party seems to have no impact on stock market performance throughout history. The market is an extremely resilient wealth creation mechanism that rewards its investor for patience and discipline. Investing in the stock market is not the same as walking into a casino. While many speculators gamble with short-term trades, and some of them make money, a lot more of them lose money on bad bets. However, investing is a science and working with a fee-only fiduciary CFP® is a great way to know that you are getting a properly constructed portfolio that meets your goals.
Thayer Financial, L.L.C. (“Thayer Financial”) is a registered investment adviser offering advisory services in the State of North Carolina and in other jurisdictions where exempted. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. This website’s presence on the Internet shall not be directly or indirectly interpreted as a solicitation of investment advisory services to persons of another jurisdiction unless otherwise permitted by statute. Follow-up or individualized responses to consumers in a particular state by Thayer Financial in the rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation shall not be made without our first complying with jurisdiction requirements or according to an applicable state exemption.
All written content on this site is for information purposes only. Opinions expressed herein are solely those of Thayer Financial, L.L.C., unless otherwise specifically cited. Material presented is believed to be from reliable sources and no representations are made by our firm as to other parties’ informational accuracy or completeness. All information or ideas provided should be discussed in detail with an advisor, accountant or legal counsel prior to implementation.